Apparently, no one among the RNC attendees or the pundits pontificating thereupon ever read Ralph Ellison’s 1952 novel, Invisible Man. When Clint Eastwood decided to make President Barack Obama invisible, he re-instituted the social invisibility Ellison described and all African-Americans lived then as many live now. Mr. Eastwood managed to deny President Obama’s right to exist and be seen with a brilliant piece of staging. While the pundits laugh at him as the embarrassing old uncle, I tremble with the evil brilliance of his act. I doubt Eastwood even read the book. He may not fully realize the racism of his actions. Nonetheless, he denied our first African-American President of his face then put foul language into his imagined mouth in a manner that would make the most despicable member of the Ku Klux Klan dance with glee.
-
Copywrite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.-
Recent Posts
Archives
Academic Publications
- Conrad Weiser Biography
- Constructing Community & the Diversity Dilemma
- Education, Economics, & Orthodoxy
- Ezechiel Sangmeister's Way of Life in Greater Pennsylvania
- Frontiers of Body & Soul
- IHR Review
- PMBH Review
- Poor Children & Enlightened Citizens
- Samuel Eckerlin Biography
- This Day in the American Revolution
- WMQ Review
Blogroll
- From the Secretary John Churchill on Phi Beta Kappa
- Origins Scholl Ctr. @ Newberry Library
- Photemeral Jeremy Pardoe’s Photography
- Sarah Crosby Campbell
- Susan Blumberg Kason
- The 1:1 Diaries David Korfhage, PhD
- The Historical Society
- The Retort J. Drew Scott
- The Way of Improvement Leads Home John Fea, PhD
- University of Venus Inside Higher Ed
More Stories
Presentations
The Historical Society
University of Venus
- Academia's 3Ms (Merit, Money, Marriage)
- Academic Abbey
- Academic Identity Crises
- Baccalaureate Bologna
- Change by Exchange
- Empty Nest
- From the Tenure Side-Lines
- In Loco Parentis – Luxus?
- Mater: de Facto et de Jure
- Power, Passion, and Pedagogy
- Pride, Prejudice, and Publication
- Risks of the Road Less Traveled
- Sex, Stars, and Stripes
- Stuck in the Middle
- Summer's Labour's Lost
- The Four Seasons
- The Geography of Hope
- The Good Life
- The Post-Modern MRS
- The Sins of Secular Saints
- Tiger Mothers & Superficial Scholars
- Time Off
- Trust, Funds, and Friends
- What Defines a Dilettante?
- What If You Could Do Anything?
- When Everyone Leads, Who Labors?
- When Worlds Collide
- Why Women Should Be Fellows
- Working Man's PhD







POWERFUL!
Excellent observation and analysis.
Melissa Harris-Perry is the one pundit willing to put Eastwood in context with Ellison:
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/melissa-harris-perry/48870509#48870509
Yo – I agree that Republicans use racial coding all the time, but yours is a pretty simplistic reading of “Invisible Man”. The narrator’s invisibility is emotional, social, political, socioeconomic, racial, and sexual – it’s not just “white man makes black man invisible.” The narrator’s invisibility allows him to “pass”, view the world from different perspectives, and develop himself. Invisibility is both forced on him by society but it is also a personal choice that allows him to grow powerful. So if Eastwood is referencing “Invisible Man”, it’s really a compliment to Obama, who also happens to adore that book.
Ben, You are of course correct about the multifaceted outcomes of invisibility. I was thrilled by the way Melissa Harris Perry handled it, which I posted above. My shock was that no one confronted head on the undeniable racial components of invisibility, which is deeply tied to our history of racism in its origins even if Ellison demonstrated unexpected positive outcomes from his invisible status.
Lest anyone questioned the deep-seated (pun intended) racism in #Eastwooding: http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/20/13989510-empty-chair-lynchings-anti-obama-protests-gone-too-far?lite